Vice President Mike Pence hired a new press secretary last week. But it wasn’t Katie Waldman’s career move that had...Keep reading...
Federal court ruling undermines progressive plans to sidestep Electoral College in 2020: Report
Ever since Donald Trump won the White House in the Electoral College despite losing the national popular vote, many Democrats — including New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — have spoken at length about ways to sidestep (or abolish) the Electoral College to ensure that whoever wins the popular vote is declared the national winner.
Unfortunately for them, a major circuit court ruling has just undermined their best plan in that regard, effectively nullifying a compact between states who have already pledged their electoral votes in 2020 to whichever candidate wins the national popular vote, according to Fox News.
The rogue elector
The three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the state of Colorado on Tuesday in a case that stemmed from the 2016 election.
The case involved an elector from Colorado who had opted not to follow state law on Election Night 2016, according to the Associated Press. While Colorado requires electors to vote for the winner of the state’s popular vote, this elector checked his ballot for then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich.
This prompted state officials to replace the “rogue elector” with an elector who promised to choose the state’s winner, Hillary Clinton — and a lawsuit ensued alleging that the state mishandled the situation.
After a series of appeals, the 10th Circuit finally ruled 2-1 Tuesday that while states have the constitutional authority to appoint electors to the Electoral College at their discretion, it’s ultimately up to the electors who they cast they their votes for.
“Article II and the Twelfth Amendment provide presidential electors the right to cast a vote for President and Vice President with discretion,” the split decision read. “And the state does not possess countervailing authority to remove an elector and to cancel his vote in response to the exercise of that Constitutional right.”
A crippling blow
The 10th Circuit’s ruling looks to have dealt a crippling blow to the interstate National Popular Vote compact, an agreement involving 15 states and the District of Columbia who have all promised to require their respective electors to cast their votes for the winner of the national popular vote, regardless of which candidate wins their state.
Based on the court’s Tuesday decision, however, it seems the states have no constitutional authority to mandate how their electors vote.
For her part, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was likely hit especially hard by this ruling; she has been among those at the forefront of the push for the abolition of the Electoral College, an institution that she called a racist “scam” earlier this week.
But in the end, the Electoral College isn’t going anywhere anytime soon — no matter how hard Dems like AOC try to get around it.
Sorry, not sorry.
JOIN THE MOVEMENT
Add your best email address below to start receiving news alerts.
The mainstream media spent much of last week trying to manufacture yet another scandal involving President Donald Trump — but...Keep reading...
“She knows her days are numbered,” conservative radio host Randy Corporon said of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg this...Keep reading...
In remarks to reporters on Sunday before heading to Houston for a rally with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President...Keep reading...
Ruth Bader Ginsburg has long faced critics who say she should have stepped down while former President Barack Obama was...Keep reading...
For the first time in the 2020 Democratic primary race, Joe Biden’s lead appears to be collapsing. The Hill reports...Keep reading...